<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sacramento Building Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sacbuildingperformance.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com</link>
	<description>Energy Efficiency, Green Building &#38; Building Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac&#8217;s Maneuvering Spell The End of PACE? by Fran Vorres</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2010/07/08/does-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-maneuvering-spell-the-end-of-pace/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran Vorres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=1111#comment-298</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fran Vorres...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Does Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac&#8217;s Maneuvering Spell The End of PACE? &#171; Sacramento Building Performance[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fran Vorres&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Does Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac&#8217;s Maneuvering Spell The End of PACE? &laquo; Sacramento Building Performance[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Near a Wooded Area?  Consider These Fire Resistant Building Products by contractors,construction</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2010/06/22/building-near-a-wooded-area-consider-these-products/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>contractors,construction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=982#comment-296</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;contractors,construction...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Building Near a Wooded Area? Consider These Fire Resistant Building Products &#171; Sacramento Building Performance[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>contractors,construction&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Building Near a Wooded Area? Consider These Fire Resistant Building Products &laquo; Sacramento Building Performance[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ductwork Testing by homes for sale in california</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2010/04/29/ductwork-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>homes for sale in california</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=24#comment-278</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;homes for sale in california...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Ductwork Testing &#171; Sacramento Building Performance[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>homes for sale in california&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Ductwork Testing &laquo; Sacramento Building Performance[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMUD Home Performance Project Saves Over 50% by SMUD enters the home stretch with their Home Performance Program &#124; Word Press</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2011/02/05/smud-home-performance-project-saves-over-50/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>SMUD enters the home stretch with their Home Performance Program &#124; Word Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=1232#comment-277</guid>
		<description>[...] to information found on Sacbuildingperformance.com, SMUD customers enroll in the &#8220;Home Performance Program&#8221; to scientifically assess and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to information found on Sacbuildingperformance.com, SMUD customers enroll in the &#8220;Home Performance Program&#8221; to scientifically assess and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dual Flush Toilet Retrofit Kit by Vacuum Breaker</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2010/02/08/dual-flush-toilet-retrofit-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Vacuum Breaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=302#comment-257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Vacuum Breaker...&lt;/strong&gt;

Dual Flush Toilet Retrofit Kit &#171; Sacramento Building Performance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vacuum Breaker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Dual Flush Toilet Retrofit Kit &laquo; Sacramento Building Performance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMUD Dramatically Increases Rebates for Home Performance! by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2011/03/27/smud-dramatically-increases-rebates-for-home-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=1269#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Genevieve,
Energy efficient windows are definitely eligible for the generous SMUD rebates that are available through the Energy Upgrade California Program.
The first step is to schedule an energy performance assessment for your home.  This comprehensive assessment is currently available for just $99!
Contact me at 916-416-0676 to schedule yours.

Thanks!

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genevieve,<br />
Energy efficient windows are definitely eligible for the generous SMUD rebates that are available through the Energy Upgrade California Program.<br />
The first step is to schedule an energy performance assessment for your home.  This comprehensive assessment is currently available for just $99!<br />
Contact me at 916-416-0676 to schedule yours.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMUD Dramatically Increases Rebates for Home Performance! by Genevieve Moulos</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2011/03/27/smud-dramatically-increases-rebates-for-home-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Genevieve Moulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=1269#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I am interested in new double pane windows in my home. How do I find out if I qualify for a rebate?
G Moulos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in new double pane windows in my home. How do I find out if I qualify for a rebate?<br />
G Moulos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time of Sale Energy Rating by Kria</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2010/08/01/time-of-sale-energy-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Kria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=1011#comment-220</guid>
		<description>If they do become mandated I would like to see a choice be given to the buyer and seller.  That choice would be to apply the money (400-600 dollars) to weatherization or to higher performing HVAC or appliances or light bulbs or for the audit/ label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they do become mandated I would like to see a choice be given to the buyer and seller.  That choice would be to apply the money (400-600 dollars) to weatherization or to higher performing HVAC or appliances or light bulbs or for the audit/ label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time of Sale Energy Rating by Kria</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2010/08/01/time-of-sale-energy-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Kria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=1011#comment-219</guid>
		<description>I am a Realtor that believes in greening our housing stock.  That is why I have greened so many MLS systems.  I do think that there are people out there that would like to have energy efficient homes.  Those are the people that are least able to afford audits and the improvements.  

I do try to green my transactions by negotiating green.  That might mean I get a higher performing furnace or something else like that.  If there is a 500 dollar mandated audit in there... I may not be able to get that work done.  Frankly I would rather hire the person installing the better performing furnace than I would an auditor. (please understand that that is in a context of a first time buyer that doesn&#039;t have a lot of money)

I do think having mandated audits like Europe does is a burden.  

In my area the PUD&#039;s already collect money to pay for a free energy audit, which we are not allowed to use during a sale of a house.  I think this should be allowed to see if it produces the desired results or not.  I know that the &quot;free&quot; audits that we pay for every month, don&#039;t have a very high success rate in producing the work to the property that would reduce energy consumption.  I am not sure it would produce different results by inserting it into a real estate transaction. 

If we are going to have mandated audits for the residential sector, the scope should be about the building envelope, not the already performance tested and labeled appliances and HVAC.  I think most people don&#039;t understand how important the building envelope is in relation to the energy consumption of the house.   

It would be a lot less expensive to look at the building envelope than it would to look at the whole house every time there is a sale on it.  If the audits include thing like the appliances and HVAC and light bulbs, it becomes necessary to relabel more frequently.  I think this piece needs to be rethought.


Personally I would rather see people spend money on the improvements.  

If there is a greened MLS with the green certs for new construction and with all of the stand alone items like the appliances and HVAC, added insulation, double and triple paned windows etc, then an energy label really isn&#039;t necessary.  From the perspective of getting the green value for a greened or green cert home it is not necessary.  Appraisers and Realtors are able to find the green value.  It also isn&#039;t necessary in order to market greened or green cert homes.  People understand the labels ~ passiv Haus, LEED and Energy star.  

Audits should be available for people that want to and can afford to do the improvements.  I have used auditors to deep green houses.  That is a great resource for someone that can afford to do so.  

One other thing to consider.  All over the country there is scope of work that has to be done in order to close a transaction.  Here we have to replace sewer lines and decommission oil tanks.  I don&#039;t remember the state but they have to replace all the plumbing fixtures.  We also have to take out wood burning stoves.  I am not intending to provide an exhaustive list.  But all of that costs money.

Let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Realtor that believes in greening our housing stock.  That is why I have greened so many MLS systems.  I do think that there are people out there that would like to have energy efficient homes.  Those are the people that are least able to afford audits and the improvements.  </p>
<p>I do try to green my transactions by negotiating green.  That might mean I get a higher performing furnace or something else like that.  If there is a 500 dollar mandated audit in there&#8230; I may not be able to get that work done.  Frankly I would rather hire the person installing the better performing furnace than I would an auditor. (please understand that that is in a context of a first time buyer that doesn&#8217;t have a lot of money)</p>
<p>I do think having mandated audits like Europe does is a burden.  </p>
<p>In my area the PUD&#8217;s already collect money to pay for a free energy audit, which we are not allowed to use during a sale of a house.  I think this should be allowed to see if it produces the desired results or not.  I know that the &#8220;free&#8221; audits that we pay for every month, don&#8217;t have a very high success rate in producing the work to the property that would reduce energy consumption.  I am not sure it would produce different results by inserting it into a real estate transaction. </p>
<p>If we are going to have mandated audits for the residential sector, the scope should be about the building envelope, not the already performance tested and labeled appliances and HVAC.  I think most people don&#8217;t understand how important the building envelope is in relation to the energy consumption of the house.   </p>
<p>It would be a lot less expensive to look at the building envelope than it would to look at the whole house every time there is a sale on it.  If the audits include thing like the appliances and HVAC and light bulbs, it becomes necessary to relabel more frequently.  I think this piece needs to be rethought.</p>
<p>Personally I would rather see people spend money on the improvements.  </p>
<p>If there is a greened MLS with the green certs for new construction and with all of the stand alone items like the appliances and HVAC, added insulation, double and triple paned windows etc, then an energy label really isn&#8217;t necessary.  From the perspective of getting the green value for a greened or green cert home it is not necessary.  Appraisers and Realtors are able to find the green value.  It also isn&#8217;t necessary in order to market greened or green cert homes.  People understand the labels ~ passiv Haus, LEED and Energy star.  </p>
<p>Audits should be available for people that want to and can afford to do the improvements.  I have used auditors to deep green houses.  That is a great resource for someone that can afford to do so.  </p>
<p>One other thing to consider.  All over the country there is scope of work that has to be done in order to close a transaction.  Here we have to replace sewer lines and decommission oil tanks.  I don&#8217;t remember the state but they have to replace all the plumbing fixtures.  We also have to take out wood burning stoves.  I am not intending to provide an exhaustive list.  But all of that costs money.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMUD Home Performance Project Saves Over 50% by sacramento replacement windows tax rebate</title>
		<link>http://sacbuildingperformance.com/2011/02/05/smud-home-performance-project-saves-over-50/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>sacramento replacement windows tax rebate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 06:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacbuildingperformance.com/?p=1232#comment-212</guid>
		<description>[...] SMUD Home Performance Project Saves Over 50% ?« Sacramento Building &#8230; Feb 5, 2011 &#8230; SMUD Dramatically Increases Rebates for Home Performance! &#8230; Energy Efficient Windows &#8230; new HVAC system and are eligible for $1500 federal tax credit. &#8230; it may also include HVAC system replacement, window upgrades, &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SMUD Home Performance Project Saves Over 50% ?« Sacramento Building &#8230; Feb 5, 2011 &#8230; SMUD Dramatically Increases Rebates for Home Performance! &#8230; Energy Efficient Windows &#8230; new HVAC system and are eligible for $1500 federal tax credit. &#8230; it may also include HVAC system replacement, window upgrades, &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

